About Me

Name: Matty
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Morality

I have said it many times before: no one legislates morality like a liberal.

Why has this been called into question so often by the same leftists whose motto used to be (and truly--silently--still is) "the personal is political"? These are the same people who want to take tax money from people and apply it to ways they perceive to be moral or, as my friend Zach oddly put it, efficacious; in doing so, they inflict their moral visions on all parties involved much more blatantly and consistently than any conservative policy ever could or would.

I will take this a step further: a conservative in the United States should truly be close to a libertarian in many respects. Libertarians have almost nothing to do with the legislation of morality. Do I say this since I align with the libertarian philosophy in many ways? Yes, because I believe this also aligns me with conservatism. We conservatives believe in a strict following and interpretation of the Constitution. We do not ideologically, as so many accuse Bush, try to skirt the document. The document is clearly founded on the libertarian positions of mistrust of government and supreme sovereignty from the people. Liberals and their plans for large, centralized government are the ones who must ignore, skirt, spit upon, and otherwise hate the Constitution.

If people on the Right happen to be religious, so be it. It reinforces the idea of natural rights from our Creator quite well. When we are all equal, we are all free. This does not entail any morality not already guaranteed us by our Founders, whatever you perceive them to be (God, Jefferson, etc.).

Ask yourself, after all, why we rarely, if ever, hear the term "small-government conservative" anymore. Which of us, by definition, is not?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Musing

Here's a quick thought that passes through my mind every now and then (and one certainly of suspect logical basis):

Don't we often hear that education correlates with liberalism?
Don't we also often hear of journalistic education and intellectual integrity as the standards by which they operate?
To extrapolate the former to the latter leads to an interesting conclusion. The statistics about education and liberalism should at least apply to those well-educated journalists.

Oh, the Left...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why Conservatism?

They (the cynics) tell us that politicians are liars, that they only serve their own agenda and rarely feel the need to carry out ours unless it makes them look good for the election. There's probably quite a bit of merit to this accusation. It comes from the Left and from the Right. Why, then, should we avoid becoming apathetic to the system? What makes Conservatism more valuable than opposing views?

It seems to me the chief reason is that there is a respect for liberty on the Right in this country. Oft-cited Darth Bush tactics against freedom are, at best, straw man arguments against conservatives. Right-wing sellout apologists (a.k.a. Ron Paul supporters on YouTube) buy into this nonsense so they can still remain "Republicans" while not feeling bad for, say, defending the country's national interests.

But I can't say I blame them. The Media in this country are dastardly with their bastardization of anyone who expresses a true conservative idea. Despite what I hear from Noam Chomsky, the Media are still Left-leaning in this country.

And this is the chief problem with the Left. Our philosophy offers them the ability to retain their beliefs. If their concern for the poor truly is high, they can donate their own money to support them (as many conservatives also do). Their philosophy stifles our values. If someone doesn't believe that he should have to pay for someone else's health care, it doesn't matter to the Left; he must be brought on board with the grand plan. We reject this, and they throw it at us with greater vehemence since they are so sure they are correct to believe that the government is the best solution.

Ideologically, I don't see how anyone who understands the principles upon which the Framers crafted this country can support such large governmental policies without rejecting them. Mark Levin once asked a "lib" caller which founding father would have supported his views of large, centralized government. The caller actually had the correct answer: none.

"Logic" is a part of our ideological view, though. Liberals have more important things on which to focus mental energy: Why think with our brains when we have hearts?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »